The claimant purchased a product called cement in Andhra Pradesh, while the claimant had a branch in Coimbatore, where the goods were to arrive. While the goods were in transit, the IRS defendant stopped the vehicle and found that there was a violation of the buyer's address not listed on the invoice.
Proceeds will be charged for the above offenses and also for alleged misconduct of malfunctioning of the Coimbatore branch where the claimant will be assigned an address and then for breach.
According to the decision published in the newspaper of March 7, 2022, it is a notice called "Notice", but the same question of the court was raised in this case.
Submission of pretentious
The expert, Mr. G. Natarajan, who appeared on behalf of the plaintiff, said that the absence of the address of the buyer was not a serious or illegal offense and that the property could not be seized by the IRS.
Submission of department
M.C. Harsha Raj, an additional federal expert who appeared with the IRS, argued that this was not the first case of such crimes to be uncovered due to the nature of the crime already known to the IRS. Customers and not mentioned in documents such as invoices, etc.
Further, according to the Complainant, the Complainant's branch, located in Coimbatore, was a non-functional office, and investigation revealed that there was no IRS acquisition or retention.
Therefore, in order to put everything together, this sentence is decided by the order of March 11, 2022, and the next decision is aimed at the petitioner according to the final sentence written decision, but the petitioner has only resisted communication since March 7, 2022. This is only a notice, and the function of the above notice, which is not contained herein, is that payment must be made within three days.
Order of court:
12. I have decided on the above contests which were conducted by a teacher representing both parties and read from the material presented in this court.
13. The petitioner's attorney also said that the petitioner's interest was a serious offense by the fact that two car accidents bought by the plaintiff are now under arrest. Thus, the applicant's right to appeal to the court against the current by the judgment of March 11, 2022, regardless of the amount of the fine for the grievances This allegation will be predetermined for the commercial product. not guilty.
14. A motion filed by petitioners by a survey attorney shall be filed in this Court.
15. Even if the petitioner's lawyer says so or so, the total amount is only 5 million labs. 5,000/- will still be charged, and such consent cannot be obtained by the government official in addition to the accused, and this violation is repeated as follows.
16. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in order to balance the merits of the parties, the court decided to withdraw this notice with the following orders: